SPEAKERS
Abstract
Checklists remain one of the most effective tools for improving consistency and quality in complex engineering environments. This workshop explores how checklists evolved from early aviation and medical practice into essential instruments for structured reviews, predictable workflows, and reliable ASPICE assessment outcomes. Participants will examine the characteristics of high quality checklists—clarity, specificity, brevity, and measurable intent—and how these qualities directly translate to stronger peer reviews, more complete evidence capture, and fewer assessment surprises.
As organizations increasingly incorporate AI into engineering workflows, we highlight a modern extension of checklist value: the same principles that make checklist items strong also underpin well crafted AI prompts. By practicing concise intent, explicit constraints, and clear expected outputs, teams naturally strengthen their ability to generate prompts that produce consistent and auditable AI generated content.
The workshop includes two interactive exercises: a simulated ASPICE peer review using a structured checklist and a collaborative improvement of a real world checklist, followed by converting key items into reusable AI prompt patterns. Through these exercises, participants will experience how improved checklist structure raises review quality and how those improvements map directly to more effective AI assisted analysis.
Ideal for engineers, reviewers, assessors, and quality leaders, this session equips participants with practical methods to build better checklists, improve ASPICE readiness, and leverage AI tools with greater precision and confidence.
Value
The Checklist Manifesto workshop helps participants use simple, structured checklists to reduce errors, improve consistency, and boost team coordination. It also shows how checklists strengthen AI prompting—clarifying intent, breaking down tasks, and improving the quality and reliability of AI‑generated outputs. Attendees leave with practical tools to streamline complex work, enhance decision‑making, and get better, faster results from both teams and AI systems.
Workshop Agenda
Agenda (120 minutes)
Detailed:
12-16 slides, laid out something like this. Note, this is still in process and subject to change
Subtitle: Strengthening ASPICE Peer Reviews, QA Audits, and AI Prompts
- 2. Workshop Overview — Objectives, 120 min agenda, exercises, outcomes
- 3. Why Checklists Matter — Cognitive load, error prevention, consistency
- 4. A Short History — Aviation → healthcare → engineering (key lessons)
- 5. How Checklists Help Humans — Memory limits, coordination, shared view
- 6. Anatomy of a Great Checklist — Purpose, brevity, action verbs, flow
- 7. Checklist Anti Patterns — Too long, vague, redundant, ownerless
- 8. ASPICE Alignment — Where checklists reinforce peer reviews, evaluations, and audit evidence
- 9. Bridge: Checklists ↔ AI Prompts —
- Clarity → explicit prompt intent
- Action verbs → directive instructions
- Measurable criteria → verifiable outputs
- Scope control → reduced hallucinations
- 10. Prompt Engineering Essentials (Lite) — Role, context, constraints, examples, output format
- 11. Exercise 1 Instructions — Peer review simulation using a checklist
- 12. Exercise 1 Debrief — What improved? What the checklist surfaced?
- 13. Exercise 2 Instructions — Improve a real checklist and convert key items into a reusable prompt pattern
- 14. Before & After Examples — Better items and their matching prompts
- 15. Maintaining Great Checklists & Prompts — Ownership, versioning, refresh cadence
- 16. Takeaways + Q&A — Next steps and adoption tips
